Media and information literacy as a strategic guideline toward civic resilience: Baltic–Nordic lessons.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBalčytienė, Auksė
dc.contributor.authorJuraitė, Kristina
dc.coverage.spatialBogotá D.C.
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-11T20:05:11Z
dc.date.available2024-06-11T20:05:11Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionCapítulo completo en acceso abierto que hace parte de la obra Media and information literacy for the public good: UNESCO MILID Yearbook 2023.es
dc.description.abstractThe chapter informs about the increasing necessity for media and information literacy (MIL) to act as a strategic guideline toward civic resilience against the detrimental effects of digital transformation in Baltic and Nordic countries. Despite evident differences between the two regions, similarities are noted among countries in terms of the urgency of requests to adequately respond to information disruption such as information manipulation and the influx of disinformation. Nordic countries exhibit a progressive outlook on MIL with well-established institutionalized media education programs and a commitment to regularly assess and adjust MIL objectives in response to evolving digital landscapes and their flaws. However, concern is increasing about the economic and business challenges faced by conventional news media on the one hand and public trust in media on the other hand.es
dc.format.extent29 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationBalčytienė, A., & Juraitė, K. (2023). Media and information literacy as a strategic guideline toward civic resilience: Baltic–Nordic lessons. pp. 53-81. Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO.
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios
dc.identifier.isbn9789587637052
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Colecciones Digitales Uniminuto
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.uniminuto.edu
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.uniminuto.edu/handle/10656/19430
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26620/uniminuto/978-958-763-705-2.cap.3
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCorporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO
dc.relation.ispartofMedia and information literacy for the public good: UNESCO MILID Yearbook 2023.
dc.relation.urihttps://repository.uniminuto.edu/handle/10656/19196
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.localOpen Access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectCiudadanía informada
dc.subjectTransformación digital
dc.subjectEcosistema de comunicación mediada
dc.subjectAgencia
dc.subjectResiliencia cívica
dc.subjectPaíses bálticos
dc.subjectPaíses nórdicos
dc.subject.ddc374.0124
dc.subject.keywordsInformed citizenship
dc.subject.keywordsDigital transformation
dc.subject.keywordsMediated communication ecosystem
dc.subject.keywordsAgency
dc.subject.keywordsCivic resilience
dc.subject.keywordsBaltic countries
dc.subject.keywordsNordic countries
dc.subject.lembLiteracy (Education) — Case Studies
dc.subject.lembPrimary Education 3.Adult Literacy — Research
dc.subject.lembEducation and Development
dc.subject.lembVocational Training
dc.subject.lembMedia Literacy
dc.titleMedia and information literacy as a strategic guideline toward civic resilience: Baltic–Nordic lessons.
dc.typeBook chapter
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
dc.type.spaCapítulo de libro
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAchen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAllern, S., & Pollack, E. (2019). Journalism as a public good: A Scandinavian perspective. Journalism, 20(11), 1423–1439. https://doi. org/10.1177/1464884917730945
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAylott, N. (2017). Models of democracy in Nordic and Baltic Europe: Political institutions and discourse. Routledge.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBalčytienė, A. (2017). Informed citizenship, journalistic professionalism, and democracy: What is old, what is new, and what is unresolved? In: BajomiLazar, P. (Ed.) Media in third-wave democracies: Southern and Central/ Eastern Europe in a comparative perspective. Editions L’Harmattan, 45–58.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBalčytienė, A. (2021). Crisis of agency in Central and Eastern Europe: From the consolidation of media freedom to the institutionalisation of free choice. Javnost – The Public, 28(1), 75–89, https://doi.org/10.1080/131 83222.2021.1861404.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBalčytienė, A., & Juraitė, K. (2022). Baltic democracies: Re-configuring media environments and civic agency. Journal of Baltic Studies, 53(4), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2022.2117833
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBarrett, B., Dommett, K., & Kreiss, D. (2021). The capricious relationship between technology and democracy: Analyzing public policy discussions in the UK and US. Policy & Internet, 13(4), 522–543. https://doi. org/10.1002/poi3.266
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBayer, J., Bitiukova, N., Bard, P., Szakacs, J., & Uszkiewicz, E. (2019). Disinformation and propaganda: Impact on the functioning of the rule of law in the European Union and its member states. Study of the European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ STUD/2019/608864/IPOL_STU(2019)608864_EN.pdf
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBenkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBennett, L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBennett, P., McDougall, J., & Potter, J. (2020). The uses of media literacy. Routledge.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org /10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBoulliane, S., Tenove, C., & Buffie, J. (2022). Complicating the resilience model: A four-country study about misinformation. Media and Communication, 10(3), 169–182. doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5346
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (2003). Įvadas į refleksyvią sociologiją. Baltos Lankos.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBrandtzaeg, P., Lüders, M., Spangenberg, J., Rath-Wiggins, L., & Følstad, A. (2015). Emerging journalistic verification practices concerning social media. Journalism Practice, 10(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17 512786.2015.1020331
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBrown, K. (2013). Global environmental change I: A social turn for resilience? Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 107–117. https://doi. org/10.1177/0309132513498837
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCardoso, G. (2011). From mass to networked communication. In S. Papathanassopoulos (Ed.). Media perspectives for the 21st century (pp. 117-136). London: Routledge.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCarlsson, U. (Ed.) (2019). Understanding media and information literacy in the digital age: A question of democracy. Nordicom.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCentre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (2022). Monitoring media pluralism in the digital era: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor in the European Union, Albania, Montenegro, the Republic of North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey in the year 2021. European University Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/74712
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChadwick, A., & Stanyer, J. (2022). Deception as a bridging concept in the study of disinformation, misinformation, and misperceptions: Toward a holistic framework. Communication Theory, 32(1), 1–24. https://doi. org/10.1093/ct/qtab019
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDahlgren, P. (2005). The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDeuze, M. (2008). The Changing Context of News Work: Liquid Journalism and Monitorial Citizenship, International Journal of Communication, Vol. 2, 848–865.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDuvold, K. (2017). Between flawed and full democracy: Twenty years of Baltic independence. In: Aylott, N. (Ed.) Models of democracy in Nordic and Baltic Europe. Routledge, 39-76.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFlash Eurobarometer (2022). News & media survey 2022. European Parliament. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2832
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFoa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2016). The danger of deconsolidation: The democratic disconnect. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 5–17.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationForsman, M. (2020). Media literacy and the emerging media citizen in the Nordic media welfare state. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 2(1), 59–70. https://www.doi.org/10.2478/njms-2020-0006
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFrau-Meigs, D. (2022). How disinformation reshaped the relationship between journalism and media and information literacy (MIL): Old and new perspectives revisited. Digital Journalism, 10(5), 912–922. https://doi. org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2081863
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFreelon, D., & Wells, C. (2020). Disinformation as political communication. Political Communication, 37(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/1058 4609.2020.1723755
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGiddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Polity.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGrabe, M., & Myrick, J. (2016). Informed citizenship in a media-centric way of life. Journal of Communication, 66, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jcom.12215
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHaavik, T. K. (2020). Societal resilience: Clarifying the concept and upscaling the scope. Safety science, 132(104964). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ssci.2020.104964
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHall, P., & Lamont, M. (2013). Social resilience in the neoliberal era. Cambridge University Press.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHannan, J. (2018). Trolling ourselves to death? Social media and post-truth politics. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 214–226. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760323
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHauser, M. (2018). Metapopulism in-between democracy and populism: Transformations of Laclau’s Concept of Populism with Trump and Putin. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 19(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1 080/1600910X.2018.1455599
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHenriksen, L., Strømsnes, K., & Svedberg, L. (2018). Civic engagement in Scandinavia: Volunteering, informal help and giving in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Springer.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHofmann, J. (2019). Mediated democracy – linking digital technology to political agency. Internet Policy Review 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1416
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHumprecht, E., Esser, F., Van Aelst, P., Staender, A., & Morosoli, S. (2021). The sharing of disinformation in cross-national comparison: Analyzing patterns of resilience. Information, Communication & Society, 26(7), 1342–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2006744
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJastramskis, D., Rožukalnė, A., & Jõesaar, A. (2017). Media concentration in the Baltic States (2000–2014). Informacijos mokslai, 77(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2017.77.10705
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJuraitė, K., & Balčytienė, A. (2022). Accelerating information consumption and challenges to MIL amidst COVID-19 in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. The Routledge Handbook of Media Education Futures Post-Pandemic. Routledge, 417-424
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKalpokas, I. (2019). Affective encounters of the algorithmic kind: Post-truth and post-human pleasure. Social Media + Society, published online before print on May 29, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119845678.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKeck, M., & Sakdapolrak, P. (2013). What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward. Erdkunde, 67(1), 5–19. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/23595352.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKoivunen, A. (2021). Managing moods: Media, politicians, and anxiety over public debate. In: Koivunen, A., Ojala, J., & Holmén, J. (Eds.) The Nordic economic, social and political model. Challenges in the 21st century. Routledge, 195-211.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKõuts-Klemm, R., Rožukalne, A., & Jastramskis, D. (2022). Resilience of national media systems: Baltic media in the global network environment. Journal of Baltic Studies, 53(4), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/0162 9778.2022.2103162
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKreiss, D. (2021). Social media and democracy: The state of the field, prospects for reform. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(2), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220985078
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLevitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2019). Kaip miršta demokratijos: Istorijos pamokos ateičiai. Baltos lankos.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLorenz, D. (2013). The diversity of resilience: Contributions from a social science perspective. Natural Hazards, 67(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11069-010-9654-y
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMatovic, M., Juraitė, K., & Gutierrez, A. (2017). The role of non-governmental actors in media and information literacy: A comparative media systems perspective. In: Frau-Meigs, D., Velez, I, & Michel, J. F. (Eds.) Public policies in media and information literacy in Europe: Cross-country comparisons. Routledge, 159-193.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMeinander, H. (2021). Three driving forces: Structural challenges for Nordic democracies in the 2010s. In: Koivunen, A., Ojala, J., & Holmén, J. (Eds.) The Nordic economic, social and political model challenges in the 21st century. Routledge, 20-36.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationObrist, B., Pfeiffer, C., & Henley, R. (2010). Multi-layered social resilience: A new approach in mitigation research. Progress in Development Studies, 10(4), 283–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/146499340901000402
dcterms.bibliographicCitationParvin, P. (2018). Democracy without participation: A new politics for a disengaged era. Res Publica, 24, 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158- 017-9382-1
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPorpora, D., & Sekalala, S. (2019). Truth, communication and democracy. International Journal of Communication 13, 938–955. https://ijoc.org/ index.php/ijoc/article/view/9900
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPosetti, L., & Bontcheva, K. (2020). Disinfodemic: Deciphering COVID-19 disinformation. Policy brief UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/ files/disinfodemic_deciphering_covid19_disinformation.pdf.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationShah, D., McLeod, D. M., Rojas, H., Cho, J., Wagner, M. W., & Friedland, L. A. (2017). Revising the communication mediation model for a new political communication ecology. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12115
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSiapera, E. (2022). Platform governance and the “infodemic”. Javnost – The Public, 29(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2022.2042791
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSyvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65swsg.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationStix, D., & Jolls, T. (2020). Promoting media literacy learning: A comparison of various media literacy models. Media Education, 11(1), 15–23. https:// doi.org/10.36253/me-9091
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTenove, C. (2020). Protecting democracy from disinformation: Normative threats and policy responses. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220918740
dcterms.bibliographicCitationUNESCO (2022). Journalism is a public good: World trends in freedom of expression and media development. Global report 2021/2022. https:// unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380618.locale=en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVan Aelst P., Strömbäck J., Aalberg T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, S., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVan Dijck J., Nieborg, D., & Poell, T. (2019). Reframing platform power. Internet Policy Review 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1414
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVilmer, J., Baptiste, J., Escorcia, A., Guillaume, M., & Herrera, J. (2018). Information manipulation: A challenge for our democracies. Report by the Policy Planning Staff (CAPS) of the Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs and the Institute for Strategic Research (IRSEM) of the Ministry for the Armed Forces, Paris. https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/ IMG/pdf/information_manipulation_rvb_cle838736.pdf
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWadbring, I., & Pekkala, L. (Eds.). (2017). Citizens in a mediated world: A Nordic-Baltic perspective on media and information literacy. Nordicom.
dcterms.bibliographicCitationYtre-Arne, B. & Moe, H. (2018). Approximately informed, occasionally monitorial? Reconsidering normative citizen ideals. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(2), 227-246.

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Capitulo3-Media and information literacy for the public good UNESCO MILID Yearbook_2023.pdf
Size:
914.89 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Capítulo de libro
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Científicos