DSpace Repository

Media and information literacy as a strategic guideline toward civic resilience: Baltic–Nordic lessons.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Balčytienė, Auksė
dc.contributor.author Juraitė, Kristina
dc.coverage.spatial Bogotá D.C.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-06-11T20:05:11Z
dc.date.available 2024-06-11T20:05:11Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation Balčytienė, A., & Juraitė, K. (2023). Media and information literacy as a strategic guideline toward civic resilience: Baltic–Nordic lessons. pp. 53-81. Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO.
dc.identifier.isbn 9789587637052
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.uniminuto.edu/handle/10656/19430
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.26620/uniminuto/978-958-763-705-2.cap.3
dc.description Capítulo completo en acceso abierto que hace parte de la obra Media and information literacy for the public good: UNESCO MILID Yearbook 2023. es
dc.description.abstract The chapter informs about the increasing necessity for media and information literacy (MIL) to act as a strategic guideline toward civic resilience against the detrimental effects of digital transformation in Baltic and Nordic countries. Despite evident differences between the two regions, similarities are noted among countries in terms of the urgency of requests to adequately respond to information disruption such as information manipulation and the influx of disinformation. Nordic countries exhibit a progressive outlook on MIL with well-established institutionalized media education programs and a commitment to regularly assess and adjust MIL objectives in response to evolving digital landscapes and their flaws. However, concern is increasing about the economic and business challenges faced by conventional news media on the one hand and public trust in media on the other hand. es
dc.format.extent 29 páginas
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO
dc.relation.ispartof Media and information literacy for the public good: UNESCO MILID Yearbook 2023.
dc.relation.uri https://repository.uniminuto.edu/handle/10656/19196
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject Ciudadanía informada
dc.subject Transformación digital
dc.subject Ecosistema de comunicación mediada
dc.subject Agencia
dc.subject Resiliencia cívica
dc.subject Países bálticos
dc.subject Países nórdicos
dc.subject.ddc 374.0124
dc.title Media and information literacy as a strategic guideline toward civic resilience: Baltic–Nordic lessons.
dc.type Book chapter
dc.subject.keywords Informed citizenship
dc.subject.keywords Digital transformation
dc.subject.keywords Mediated communication ecosystem
dc.subject.keywords Agency
dc.subject.keywords Civic resilience
dc.subject.keywords Baltic countries
dc.subject.keywords Nordic countries
dc.subject.lemb Literacy (Education) — Case Studies
dc.subject.lemb Primary Education 3.Adult Literacy — Research
dc.subject.lemb Education and Development
dc.subject.lemb Vocational Training
dc.subject.lemb Media Literacy
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.accessrights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Allern, S., & Pollack, E. (2019). Journalism as a public good: A Scandinavian perspective. Journalism, 20(11), 1423–1439. https://doi. org/10.1177/1464884917730945
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Aylott, N. (2017). Models of democracy in Nordic and Baltic Europe: Political institutions and discourse. Routledge.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Balčytienė, A. (2017). Informed citizenship, journalistic professionalism, and democracy: What is old, what is new, and what is unresolved? In: BajomiLazar, P. (Ed.) Media in third-wave democracies: Southern and Central/ Eastern Europe in a comparative perspective. Editions L’Harmattan, 45–58.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Balčytienė, A. (2021). Crisis of agency in Central and Eastern Europe: From the consolidation of media freedom to the institutionalisation of free choice. Javnost – The Public, 28(1), 75–89, https://doi.org/10.1080/131 83222.2021.1861404.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Balčytienė, A., & Juraitė, K. (2022). Baltic democracies: Re-configuring media environments and civic agency. Journal of Baltic Studies, 53(4), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2022.2117833
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Barrett, B., Dommett, K., & Kreiss, D. (2021). The capricious relationship between technology and democracy: Analyzing public policy discussions in the UK and US. Policy & Internet, 13(4), 522–543. https://doi. org/10.1002/poi3.266
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Bayer, J., Bitiukova, N., Bard, P., Szakacs, J., & Uszkiewicz, E. (2019). Disinformation and propaganda: Impact on the functioning of the rule of law in the European Union and its member states. Study of the European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ STUD/2019/608864/IPOL_STU(2019)608864_EN.pdf
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Bennett, L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Bennett, P., McDougall, J., & Potter, J. (2020). The uses of media literacy. Routledge.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org /10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Boulliane, S., Tenove, C., & Buffie, J. (2022). Complicating the resilience model: A four-country study about misinformation. Media and Communication, 10(3), 169–182. doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5346
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (2003). Įvadas į refleksyvią sociologiją. Baltos Lankos.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Brandtzaeg, P., Lüders, M., Spangenberg, J., Rath-Wiggins, L., & Følstad, A. (2015). Emerging journalistic verification practices concerning social media. Journalism Practice, 10(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17 512786.2015.1020331
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Brown, K. (2013). Global environmental change I: A social turn for resilience? Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 107–117. https://doi. org/10.1177/0309132513498837
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Cardoso, G. (2011). From mass to networked communication. In S. Papathanassopoulos (Ed.). Media perspectives for the 21st century (pp. 117-136). London: Routledge.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Carlsson, U. (Ed.) (2019). Understanding media and information literacy in the digital age: A question of democracy. Nordicom.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (2022). Monitoring media pluralism in the digital era: Application of the Media Pluralism Monitor in the European Union, Albania, Montenegro, the Republic of North Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey in the year 2021. European University Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/74712
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Chadwick, A., & Stanyer, J. (2022). Deception as a bridging concept in the study of disinformation, misinformation, and misperceptions: Toward a holistic framework. Communication Theory, 32(1), 1–24. https://doi. org/10.1093/ct/qtab019
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Dahlgren, P. (2005). The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Deuze, M. (2008). The Changing Context of News Work: Liquid Journalism and Monitorial Citizenship, International Journal of Communication, Vol. 2, 848–865.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Duvold, K. (2017). Between flawed and full democracy: Twenty years of Baltic independence. In: Aylott, N. (Ed.) Models of democracy in Nordic and Baltic Europe. Routledge, 39-76.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Flash Eurobarometer (2022). News & media survey 2022. European Parliament. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2832
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2016). The danger of deconsolidation: The democratic disconnect. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 5–17.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Forsman, M. (2020). Media literacy and the emerging media citizen in the Nordic media welfare state. Nordic Journal of Media Studies, 2(1), 59–70. https://www.doi.org/10.2478/njms-2020-0006
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Frau-Meigs, D. (2022). How disinformation reshaped the relationship between journalism and media and information literacy (MIL): Old and new perspectives revisited. Digital Journalism, 10(5), 912–922. https://doi. org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2081863
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Freelon, D., & Wells, C. (2020). Disinformation as political communication. Political Communication, 37(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/1058 4609.2020.1723755
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Polity.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Grabe, M., & Myrick, J. (2016). Informed citizenship in a media-centric way of life. Journal of Communication, 66, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jcom.12215
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Haavik, T. K. (2020). Societal resilience: Clarifying the concept and upscaling the scope. Safety science, 132(104964). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ssci.2020.104964
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Hall, P., & Lamont, M. (2013). Social resilience in the neoliberal era. Cambridge University Press.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Hannan, J. (2018). Trolling ourselves to death? Social media and post-truth politics. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 214–226. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760323
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Hauser, M. (2018). Metapopulism in-between democracy and populism: Transformations of Laclau’s Concept of Populism with Trump and Putin. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 19(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1 080/1600910X.2018.1455599
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Henriksen, L., Strømsnes, K., & Svedberg, L. (2018). Civic engagement in Scandinavia: Volunteering, informal help and giving in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Springer.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Hofmann, J. (2019). Mediated democracy – linking digital technology to political agency. Internet Policy Review 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1416
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Humprecht, E., Esser, F., Van Aelst, P., Staender, A., & Morosoli, S. (2021). The sharing of disinformation in cross-national comparison: Analyzing patterns of resilience. Information, Communication & Society, 26(7), 1342–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2006744
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Jastramskis, D., Rožukalnė, A., & Jõesaar, A. (2017). Media concentration in the Baltic States (2000–2014). Informacijos mokslai, 77(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2017.77.10705
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Juraitė, K., & Balčytienė, A. (2022). Accelerating information consumption and challenges to MIL amidst COVID-19 in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. The Routledge Handbook of Media Education Futures Post-Pandemic. Routledge, 417-424
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Kalpokas, I. (2019). Affective encounters of the algorithmic kind: Post-truth and post-human pleasure. Social Media + Society, published online before print on May 29, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119845678.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Keck, M., & Sakdapolrak, P. (2013). What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward. Erdkunde, 67(1), 5–19. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/23595352.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Koivunen, A. (2021). Managing moods: Media, politicians, and anxiety over public debate. In: Koivunen, A., Ojala, J., & Holmén, J. (Eds.) The Nordic economic, social and political model. Challenges in the 21st century. Routledge, 195-211.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Kõuts-Klemm, R., Rožukalne, A., & Jastramskis, D. (2022). Resilience of national media systems: Baltic media in the global network environment. Journal of Baltic Studies, 53(4), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/0162 9778.2022.2103162
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Kreiss, D. (2021). Social media and democracy: The state of the field, prospects for reform. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(2), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220985078
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2019). Kaip miršta demokratijos: Istorijos pamokos ateičiai. Baltos lankos.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Lorenz, D. (2013). The diversity of resilience: Contributions from a social science perspective. Natural Hazards, 67(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11069-010-9654-y
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Matovic, M., Juraitė, K., & Gutierrez, A. (2017). The role of non-governmental actors in media and information literacy: A comparative media systems perspective. In: Frau-Meigs, D., Velez, I, & Michel, J. F. (Eds.) Public policies in media and information literacy in Europe: Cross-country comparisons. Routledge, 159-193.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Meinander, H. (2021). Three driving forces: Structural challenges for Nordic democracies in the 2010s. In: Koivunen, A., Ojala, J., & Holmén, J. (Eds.) The Nordic economic, social and political model challenges in the 21st century. Routledge, 20-36.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Obrist, B., Pfeiffer, C., & Henley, R. (2010). Multi-layered social resilience: A new approach in mitigation research. Progress in Development Studies, 10(4), 283–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/146499340901000402
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Parvin, P. (2018). Democracy without participation: A new politics for a disengaged era. Res Publica, 24, 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158- 017-9382-1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Porpora, D., & Sekalala, S. (2019). Truth, communication and democracy. International Journal of Communication 13, 938–955. https://ijoc.org/ index.php/ijoc/article/view/9900
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Posetti, L., & Bontcheva, K. (2020). Disinfodemic: Deciphering COVID-19 disinformation. Policy brief UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/ files/disinfodemic_deciphering_covid19_disinformation.pdf.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Shah, D., McLeod, D. M., Rojas, H., Cho, J., Wagner, M. W., & Friedland, L. A. (2017). Revising the communication mediation model for a new political communication ecology. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12115
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Siapera, E. (2022). Platform governance and the “infodemic”. Javnost – The Public, 29(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2022.2042791
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O. J., & Moe, H. (2014). The media welfare state: Nordic media in the digital era. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65swsg.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Stix, D., & Jolls, T. (2020). Promoting media literacy learning: A comparison of various media literacy models. Media Education, 11(1), 15–23. https:// doi.org/10.36253/me-9091
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Tenove, C. (2020). Protecting democracy from disinformation: Normative threats and policy responses. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220918740
dcterms.bibliographicCitation UNESCO (2022). Journalism is a public good: World trends in freedom of expression and media development. Global report 2021/2022. https:// unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380618.locale=en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Van Aelst P., Strömbäck J., Aalberg T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, S., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Van Dijck J., Nieborg, D., & Poell, T. (2019). Reframing platform power. Internet Policy Review 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1414
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Vilmer, J., Baptiste, J., Escorcia, A., Guillaume, M., & Herrera, J. (2018). Information manipulation: A challenge for our democracies. Report by the Policy Planning Staff (CAPS) of the Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs and the Institute for Strategic Research (IRSEM) of the Ministry for the Armed Forces, Paris. https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/ IMG/pdf/information_manipulation_rvb_cle838736.pdf
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Wadbring, I., & Pekkala, L. (Eds.). (2017). Citizens in a mediated world: A Nordic-Baltic perspective on media and information literacy. Nordicom.
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Ytre-Arne, B. & Moe, H. (2018). Approximately informed, occasionally monitorial? Reconsidering normative citizen ideals. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(2), 227-246.
dc.type.spa Capítulo de libro
dc.type.coar http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
dc.rights.local Open Access
dc.identifier.instname instname:Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios
dc.identifier.reponame reponame:Colecciones Digitales Uniminuto
dc.identifier.repourl repourl:https://repository.uniminuto.edu


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account